#Kerbal space program 2 lagrange points how to#

If the EML-2 waypoint is established it would represent the farthest that humans have traveled from Earth to date. The report will be handed in by March 30, 2012.Īn EML-2 waypoint could also enable a significant telerobotic presence on the far side of the moon, and could serve as a platform for solar and Earth-based scientific observation, radio astronomy, and other scientific pursuits in the quite zone behind the moon. This project will need international support, and the agency is currently checking the possibility of an EML-2 outpost. The outpost could prove a staging ground for operations on and around the moon, but also act as a launch point toward Mars, the Kuiper Belt, and beyond. EML-2 is actually situated beyond the moon. For this outpost, NASA is looking at the Earth-moon Lagrange point 2 (EML-2) as the best possible site for the next manned outpost. Lagrange points for KSP2 currently the physics model only takes into account 2 bodies and it isnt really capable of making lagrange points. There are five Lagrange points around Earth. Some of the maths is taught to most people by the time they leave school, and the variables such as orbital period are usually given in fairly easy to use formulas, so if people want to find out the information they discover in the game, it's easy to do so.Īdding that extra layer just means all the 2 body maths becomes an approximation, and that just obscures the players ability to understand what is going on, which is not a good thing.The Lagrange points, or libration points or L-points, would allow the outpost to remain in an almost fixed position. I think 2 body physics is a good level of detail to have in the game. This basically, aside from implementing it in the game that surely must increase computer load a bit, given that you could no longer have however many craft on rails when unfocused. For the rest, the learning curve for KSP would just become a bit steeper.

#Kerbal space program 2 lagrange points how to#

So yes, a few advanced players would probably know how to handle them. So many players can't even work with anything but an equatorial orbit, these would definitely not appreciate existence of lagrangian points because they would have no idea how to even find them, not mentioning how to place something into them.

But could Squad 'cheat' them into the game Maybe basically add small gravity wells in the locations where these points would be and make them artificially stable to that loca. Stable and deterministic orbits are comfortable, easy to understand, easy to handle. OK, we all know that Lagrange points in the real world are a result of N-body physics. In my humble opinion, true N-body physics would be annoyance, not an improvement in KSP.

And even without auto stationkeeping, it'd still make for a much better experience. Does KSPs engine support Lagrange points With SOI implementation it seems to only account for two bodies but Im not sure, so Im curious if I could orbit a Lagrangian point or if I could place something at Kerbins L1 and have the same period as Kerbin. We'd need better tools for trajectory plotting and some sort of automated stationkeeping, but the main uses of it would be maintaining otherwise unstable orbits, which can be of great use. N-body would change the game unimaginably. It's a common misconception, and it's utterly and completely wrong. Check out Principia thread on a detailed (and math-heavy) explanation.Īs for the second, see above. All thanks to something called symplectic integration. But calculating them can be done in an efficient, CPU-light way. Yes, the n-body simulation does not have a formula, the solutions are chaotic. In practice, n-body physics wouldn't have too much of an effect apart from a few special cases - like the lagrange points. This would be very computer intensive (and I think make time warp of orbits subject to the same kind of wobbles as physics time warp on launch). a formula, which means that you essentially have to 'simulate' the motion time step by time step. To elaborate, n-body physics does not have a 'simple solution' i.e.